04.03.2016 | permalink
94 scientists explain why EFSA got it wrong on glyphosate
Peer-reviewed article criticizes EFSA over incorrect use of data, ignoring evidence of tumours in lab animals, and reliance on secret studies to come up with a verdict that glyphosate doesn’t cause cancer
A group of 94 scientists has published an article explaining the differences in the evaluation of the weedkiller glyphosate’s cancer-causing potential by two scientific organisations.
Glyphosate is sprayed on over 80% of GM crops grown worldwide and is the most used herbicide in the world.
The World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) came to opposite conclusions on the carcinogenicity of glyphosate. The IARC classified glyphosate as a “probable” human carcinogen, but EFSA said a cancer link was unlikely.
- GMWatch: 94 scientists explain why EFSA got it wrong on glyphosate
- Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health: Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
- GMWatch: NGOs press charges against Monsanto, German government institute and EFSA over glyphosate assessment
- EFSA: Open letter: Review of the Carcinogenicity of Glyphosate by EFSA and BfR
- wemove.eu: Petition: Stop Glyphosate in EU
- The Ecologist: European Union - stop glyphosate reauthorisation!
- Council of the European Union: Environment Council Press conference Friday, 4 March 2016